Texas Senate Candidate Says Bible Supports Abortion

Priscilla Du Preez, Unsplash

James Talarico, Democratic state representative from Austin and now a candidate for the U.S. Senate, made waves last month when he argued in a podcast that the Bible supports abortion, or at least permits it, in certain circumstances. On Joe Rogan’s show, Talarico pointed to Luke’s account of Mary agreeing to become pregnant only “if it is God’s will,” suggesting that this is a scriptural case of consent for creation, and therefore a basis for allowing abortion. He claimed there is no single Christian orthodoxy on abortion, and accused the religious right of focusing on controlling pregnant women rather than reducing miscarriages or expanding health care. His voice has only been elevated in recent days as his Senate campaign against John Cornyn has begun drawing more attention to his controversial remarks.  

Talarico’s voice has been elevated in recent days after he announced his bid for U.S. Senate, running against John Cornyn.  

Talarico’s argument rests on interpretation: he maintains that Mary’s consent demonstrates that creation must be voluntary, that one cannot force someone to bring life into the world against their will. He also argues that many Christians prioritize legal bans over practical measures like better care for mothers and children, framing the abortion debate as one misaligned with compassion.   

His supporters say that Talarico’s progressive theology is refreshing and necessary, offering a Christian voice that engages deeply with modern ethical concerns and emphasizes social justice. They argue that Christianity demands we care for women, and that policies should reflect mercy, not moral shaming.   

Christian Orthodoxy vs. Talarico’s Interpretation 

For many Christian conservatives, Talarico’s appeal to Mary’s “if it is God’s will” moment does not establish consent for termination of life. The traditional Christian view holds that life begins at conception, often citing Psalm 139:13–16, Jeremiah 1:5, and Luke 1:36 among other scriptures. In that view, the unborn are fully human, bearing God’s image, from the moment of conception. The notion that Mary’s response implies permission to end unborn life is seen by critics as a categorical misreading of Scripture. 

NEW: Texas House Democrat and pastor James Talarico suggests the Bible supports abortion, says there is no Biblical basis for Christians to be anti-abortion.

“So this idea that to be a Christian means you have to be anti gay and anti abortion… There really is no historical,… pic.twitter.com/GPo5udFzIF

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 18, 2025

Mary’s acceptance of being the mother does not imply she had a choice to rescind life once it was conceived. Her “yes” is better understood as obedience in faith, not a condition for life-ending measures. Christian teaching has long held that God’s creation, including the unborn, is a gift, not something to which “consent” applies in human terms. 

Practical Implications of Talarico’s View 

If legislation were shaped by Talarico’s theology, it could lead to laws permitting abortion in broader contexts than many pro-life Christians believe Scripture allows. Not only would that shift affect legal protection of unborn life, it would also shift cultural norms around the moral status of the unborn. 

Talarico’s emphasis on health care and reducing miscarriage is commendable; few Christians disagree with the importance of caring for mothers or improving medical support. But critics argue that such causes cannot replace the fundamental responsibility to protect life preborn. Loving one’s neighbor includes protecting those who cannot speak for themselves.  

Christian Conservative Reflections 

Christians who reject Talarico’s position often do so out of conviction that God’s Word, read in its entirety, does not provide room for abortion. Jesus’ teaching, the writings of Paul, and multiple Old Testament passages assert sanctity of human life. The unborn are not an after-thought in biblical theology, they are central to our understanding of God’s sovereignty, creative power, and puzzling grace. 

Moreover, framing Mary’s response as if she had the choice to abort the baby or carry Him is a troubling distortion of Scripture. God was not asking Mary whether she wanted to end a child’s life; He was asking if she would be the one to carry Jesus. Had she declined, God could have chosen another woman to fulfill His plan.  

While compassion is critical, towards women facing unplanned pregnancies, toward improving health care, toward supporting families, Scripture does not allow the end of an innocent life to be the solution to social or economic hardship. 

Conclusion 

James Talarico’s interpretation invites an important conversation about how Christian faith interacts with modern moral dilemmas. However, from a Christian conservative perspective, his view does not align with historic Christian orthodoxy on life, the nature of creation, and the value of consent as he defines it. 

Laws and public policy should reflect both mercy and truth. Christians are called not only to care for those in difficult circumstances but also to defend life as God defines it. Faith that yields compromise on basic principles invites confusion. America needs leaders who uphold both compassion and the sanctity of life, not those who redefine life’s starting line by misreading key moments in Scripture. 

Contacting your representatives should be easy, but there are myriad ways they can ignore your messages. That’s where we come in. 

Yes, Million Voices helps you with voter guides. Yes, we send letters from YOU directly to your elected officials because it’s the only way to guarantee they’ll listen to you. Yes, we publish data, articles, text messages, and help bridge the gap between education and civic action. But what do you want? Tell us today.  

We want to make YOU the hero of our American story by giving you the tools you need to make a difference, from your local, state, all the way up to the federal level. 

Join us in our mission to advocate for religious freedom, support fair and secure elections, and uphold the values that this great nation was built upon. Tell us what you want from the next four years, and we will fight to make it a reality … again!