Parents Win as New Hampshire Sides With Families

by | Jul 13, 2026

Parents Win as New Hampshire Sides With Families

Deane Bayas, Pexels

New Hampshire has handed parents a significant victory. Gov. Kelly Ayotte has signed a law requiring public school employees to answer parents’ questions about their children honestly and completely. The move places the state at the center of a growing national fight over who has the final say in a child’s life: the parents or the school.

The new law, called the Honesty and Transparency in Education Act, was signed last week. It arrives as families across the country push back against school policies that keep them in the dark about their own kids. New Hampshire is now one of the clearest fronts in a national struggle over parental rights, a fight playing out in statehouses, federal agencies, and the courts all at once.

What the Law Requires

Senate Bill 430 is short and direct. It creates a duty for state-credentialed educators to respond to written questions from parents and legal guardians about their child. Teachers must reply within 10 business days and answer, in the words of the statute, “completely and honestly.”

The requirement has real teeth. If a teacher refuses to answer, that failure counts as a violation of the state’s educator code of conduct and can be investigated by the State Board of Education. In other words, honesty with parents is now part of the job.

Notably, the law is written broadly. It is not limited to questions about gender identity, but covers any material information a parent requests about their child at school. Much of the public debate has centered on gender, yet the statute itself simply guarantees parents a truthful answer on any subject touching their child’s education and well-being.

The law is not blind to safety. An educator may decline to answer only after making a good-faith determination that responding would place the child at imminent risk of abuse or neglect. Even then, the teacher must tell the parent the request is being denied and file a report with the superintendent. Sponsor Sen. Tim Lang called it “a straight process bill,” meant simply to ensure parents receive truthful answers.

Overturning a Policy of Secrecy

The law did not appear out of nowhere. It directly overrides a 2024 court ruling by the New Hampshire Supreme Court, which had allowed a school district to keep a child’s gender identity hidden from the child’s own mother.

That case began when a Manchester mother, identified in court only as Jane Doe, discovered her child was using a different name and pronouns at school. The district had adopted a policy in 2021 that let students keep their gender identity private and instructed staff not to tell parents without the student’s permission. The court sided with the district, and lawmakers spent the next several years working to change the law.

For supporters, that secrecy policy was the heart of the problem. They argued that no school should actively hide something this significant from a loving parent. With Senate Bill 430, New Hampshire has now said plainly that parents have a right to know.

Part of a National Movement

New Hampshire is only one front in a much larger national battle over who directs a child’s upbringing. On one side, a growing number of states are strengthening the hand of parents. Several states, including Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Ohio, Tennessee, and West Virginia, now require schools to share information about a student’s gender identity with parents, and the list keeps growing.

The federal government has joined the effort. This year, the U.S. Departments of Education and Justice announced a partnership to enforce parental rights under a federal privacy law that guarantees parents access to their children’s school records. Education Secretary Linda McMahon put the principle bluntly: “Children do not belong to the State—they belong to families.” That same law was used to find California out of compliance for pressuring schools to conceal students’ gender transitions, and the Supreme Court ruled last year that parents may opt their children out of lessons that violate their beliefs.

The other side of that battle is just as active. Some states and institutions are working to pull children further from parental oversight. New Jersey lawmakers have moved to impose DEI mandates on homeschoolers and even require welfare checks on families who teach their children at home. National teachers’ unions, meanwhile, have drawn scrutiny for partnering with global groups that promote education agendas most parents never approved. Seen together, these fights reveal a country wrestling, state by state, over a single question: who is ultimately responsible for a child?

Two Views of the Same Question

Not everyone welcomes the change. The head of the state’s largest teachers’ union warned that the law risks “outing a student”, and LGBTQ advocates argue some children could be harmed if sensitive information reaches an unsupportive home. To them, a student’s privacy should come first.

Supporters see it differently. They point out that the law already protects children in genuinely dangerous homes through its abuse exception, while restoring trust between families and schools everywhere else. As Lang noted, a parent who is kept in the dark cannot watch for warning signs of depression or self-harm. Real safety, they argue, comes from parents and schools working together, not from schools keeping secrets from moms and dads.

At the center of the debate lies an old and simple truth. Children are not creatures of the state; they are sons and daughters entrusted first to their parents. Scripture places children in the care of their mothers and fathers, and American law has long recognized that parents, not judges or bureaucrats, hold the primary responsibility to raise them.

New Hampshire’s new law does not tell parents how to raise their children. It simply says that when a mother or father asks a question, the school must answer truthfully. That should not be controversial in a free country.

For families who have felt shut out of their own children’s lives, this is welcome news, and a reminder that engaged citizens can still change the law. The battle over parental rights is far from finished, in New Hampshire and nationwide. But this week, parents won. Now is the time to stay informed, support similar efforts in your own state, and pray for the children caught in the middle.

As believers, we are called to pray for our leaders and our nation. Pray for wisdom for those making these decisions, and for safety and dignity for all people affected by them.

That’s where we come in.

Prayer is at the heart of how Million Voices connects faith with civic life. Our Prayer Guide: Pray for Our Government Officials By Name is a free resource designed to help individuals, families, and small groups lift up the men and women who serve in public office—across every level of government and regardless of party.

Rooted in the scriptural call to pray “for kings and all those in authority” (1 Timothy 2:1–2), the guide offers a thoughtful framework for interceding on behalf of our leaders: for wisdom in their decisions, integrity in their conduct, protection for them and their families, and a heart for serving the common good.

Whether you’re looking to deepen your personal prayer life or to gather others in praying for our nation, this guide is a meaningful place to start. Download it here: https://millionvoices.org/mv-prayer-guide-pray-for-government-officials/

We also offer an opportunity to connect faith with action. Through our Write Now Campaign, volunteers send letters to low-propensity voters in key areas, helping inspire them to engage and make their voices heard.

Ready to take the next step? Learn more or sign up to get involved: https://millionvoices.org/volunteer/

You can also be notified when Candidate Fact Sheets become available in areas you care about: https://millionvoices.org/cfs-notify/

Share on these platforms:

Million Voices is a movement that gives voters and potential voters the foundation they need to confidently act from a biblical worldview.